Your Shopping Cart
By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please refer to our privacy policy for more information. Close
Home
› Best Practices
Western Ordered to Pay Fines
- Date: December 01, 2010
- Source: Admin
Western Refining Southwest Inc has been fined by the U.S Environmental and Protection Agency (EPA) for failing to monitor benzene discharges and illegally disposing of hazardous waste. This amounts to violation of a Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO) filed in August 2009.
The EPA Regional Administrator Al Armendariz said that in public interest, companies should follow the protocols needed to protect the environment and public health. EPA will act quickly to ensure com-pliance with the law when companies do not adhere to rules.
Letters of noncompliance
The EPA served two letters of noncompliance on Western. The first letter of noncompliance dated Sept 24. 2010 was for improper sampling during Aug 20-22, 2010 and exceeding benzene levels in wastewater during June 24-25 and Aug 23, 2010. The second letter dated Nov 1, 2010, was for improper collection of samples during Sep 3-7 and improper disposal of hazardous waste on Sep 30, 2010.
Western has 30 days, after receipt of the notification letters, to pay the fines.
About Western
The company operates a petroleum refinery in Jamestown, New Mexico, approximately 17 miles east of Gallup. Multiple violations related to improper storage and treatment of benzene, a human carcinogen present in petroleum, was associated with the refinery. The EPA and the New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) brought the violations committed by Western to light in 2009.
In 2009, when the EPA and the New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) brought the violations to the notice of Western, the company agreed to pay USD 734,008, stop all discharges of benzene and close two aeration lagoons that received hazardous waste.
The EPA Regional Administrator Al Armendariz said that in public interest, companies should follow the protocols needed to protect the environment and public health. EPA will act quickly to ensure com-pliance with the law when companies do not adhere to rules.
Letters of noncompliance
The EPA served two letters of noncompliance on Western. The first letter of noncompliance dated Sept 24. 2010 was for improper sampling during Aug 20-22, 2010 and exceeding benzene levels in wastewater during June 24-25 and Aug 23, 2010. The second letter dated Nov 1, 2010, was for improper collection of samples during Sep 3-7 and improper disposal of hazardous waste on Sep 30, 2010.
Western has 30 days, after receipt of the notification letters, to pay the fines.
About Western
The company operates a petroleum refinery in Jamestown, New Mexico, approximately 17 miles east of Gallup. Multiple violations related to improper storage and treatment of benzene, a human carcinogen present in petroleum, was associated with the refinery. The EPA and the New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) brought the violations committed by Western to light in 2009.
In 2009, when the EPA and the New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) brought the violations to the notice of Western, the company agreed to pay USD 734,008, stop all discharges of benzene and close two aeration lagoons that received hazardous waste.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
RCRA provides general guidelines for the waste management program. The EPA is required to develop an elaborate set of regulations to implement the law. The hazardous waste program provides a system for controlling hazardous waste from the generation phase to the disposal phase. The hazardous waste laws are enforced either by the State or the EPA.
Consequences of violation of RCRA
A case in point involves Marshall County, Oklahoma. Several 55-gallon drums lay outside the Carl Eugene Hines-owned H&J Auto (H&J). Marshall County emergency manager-director told Hines that the drums posed a danger and hence should be disposed of properly. A complaint with the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) followed. It said the barrels were leaking and the owners would not remove them.
An ODEQ investigation confirmed that 34 barrels were present. They were either leaking or bulging. This confirmed the presence of hazardous waste which amounted to violation of the RCRA. Further investigation by the EPA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) confirmed that Hines was at fault. The individuals involved in the case were members of a drug ring. Hines was convicted of several violations under the RCRA, including illegally transporting waste. Hines lost his appeal against the government as the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the district court’s decision.
RCRA provides general guidelines for the waste management program. The EPA is required to develop an elaborate set of regulations to implement the law. The hazardous waste program provides a system for controlling hazardous waste from the generation phase to the disposal phase. The hazardous waste laws are enforced either by the State or the EPA.
Consequences of violation of RCRA
A case in point involves Marshall County, Oklahoma. Several 55-gallon drums lay outside the Carl Eugene Hines-owned H&J Auto (H&J). Marshall County emergency manager-director told Hines that the drums posed a danger and hence should be disposed of properly. A complaint with the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) followed. It said the barrels were leaking and the owners would not remove them.
An ODEQ investigation confirmed that 34 barrels were present. They were either leaking or bulging. This confirmed the presence of hazardous waste which amounted to violation of the RCRA. Further investigation by the EPA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) confirmed that Hines was at fault. The individuals involved in the case were members of a drug ring. Hines was convicted of several violations under the RCRA, including illegally transporting waste. Hines lost his appeal against the government as the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the district court’s decision.
Source:
Compliance Trainings
Pregnancy in the Workplace: Strategies to Protect Your Organization from Pregnancy Discrimination Claims
By - Christopher W. Olmsted
On Demand Access Anytime
By - Christopher W. Olmsted
On Demand Access Anytime
How to Vet an IRB: Expose and Fix Problems Before They Threaten Your Trial
By - Madhavi Diwanji
On Demand Access Anytime
By - Madhavi Diwanji
On Demand Access Anytime
Compliance Standards
Best Sellers
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
-
By: Miles HutchinsonAdd to CartPrice: $249
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
-
San Francisco, CA | Aug 6-7, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jul 16-17, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jun 18-19, 2020
-
Los Angeles, CA | Aug 20-21, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jul 16-17, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jun 25-26, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jun 10, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jun 3-4, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jul 6-7, 2020
-
San Francisco, CA | Oct 22-23, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jul 9-10, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jun 3-4, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | June 3-4, 2020
-
Miami, FL | Jul 29-31, 2020
-
Virtual Seminar | Jun 17, 2020
-
Provider: ANSIAdd to CartPrice: $142
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
-
Provider: ANSIAdd to CartPrice: $120
-
Provider: ANSIAdd to CartPrice: $250
-
Provider: SEPTAdd to CartPrice: $299
- Add to Cart
-
Provider: Quality-Control-PlanAdd to CartPrice: $37
- Add to Cart
-
Provider: At-PQCAdd to CartPrice: $397
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
- Add to Cart
You Recently Viewed